Skip to content
Procurement Playbook

How Real-Time Spend Visibility Benefits the Lab

by ZAGENO
 | 8 min read
Article updated on
scientist closely examining lab spend

Your budget report says there is room for another order. Your lab manager knows several purchases are already on the way. Finance has not received the invoices yet.

How much is actually available to spend?

For pharma and biotech teams, spend visibility helps answer that question before the next purchase is approved. It connects the scientific products being ordered with the suppliers, projects, and budgets behind them, so purchasing decisions reflect what is currently happening in the lab.

What is spend visibility?

Spend visibility is the ability to see what an organization purchases, how much it spends, which suppliers it buys from, and which teams or budgets those purchases support. In lab procurement, it provides the product and project detail needed to understand spending across research groups, locations, and cost centers.

💡

Question

Can your team quickly answer what it spent on a product, which suppliers received that spend, who placed the orders, and how spending compares across sites and cost centers?

If your answer was no, your purchasing data is not yet providing the visibility procurement and finance need.

Real-time spend visibility adds timeliness: purchasing activity becomes visible as it moves through the ordering process, rather than only after invoices are processed. How current and complete that view is depends on which transactions are captured and how frequently connected systems update.

Why spend visibility matters in lab procurement

A supplier invoice can tell finance how much is owed without showing which research project drove the purchase. An order record may identify the scientist but omit the project code. Two sites may use different names for the same supplier or classify the same product differently.

Each record can be accurate on its own while the combined picture remains incomplete.

That makes everyday decisions harder. Procurement cannot confidently compare prices without matching products and pack sizes. Finance may underestimate budget commitments when open orders are missing. Lab managers may need to chase purchasing records before planning the next phase of research.

These gaps affect how confidently teams can use purchasing data, even when reporting tools are already available.

5 ways to improve spend visibility in lab procurement

Improve spend visibility by identifying data gaps, capturing purchasing details at the source, connecting records, tracking commitments against budgets, and acting on the findings.

  1. Find the gaps in your purchasing data

    Start with the ways your teams buy: procurement platforms, supplier websites, purchasing cards, and orders placed by email. Identify where each channel's data becomes available and who maintains it.

    Choose a reporting period and compare those sources with finance's records. Purchases missing from the procurement report reveal a coverage gap to investigate. A dashboard cannot show transactions that never reach it.

    Begin with a research site or purchasing category where missing information regularly creates extra work. Use what you learn to improve the process before expanding it.

  2. Capture useful detail when the order is placed

    Agree on the information needed to explain a purchase, including the supplier, product identifier, quantity, unit of measure, order value, project, and cost center. Collect that information within the normal purchasing process wherever possible.

    Standardize supplier names and category labels so related purchases appear together. A consistent procurement taxonomyhelps teams classify purchases in a way that makes comparisons useful. Check pack sizes before comparing prices: a lower listed price does not necessarily mean a lower unit cost.

    For scientific products, involve researchers when evaluating alternatives. Similar descriptions alone do not establish that two products will perform the same way in an experiment.

  3. Connect orders, approvals, and financial records

    Make it possible to follow a purchase from request through approval, ordering, invoicing, and payment. Procurement and finance should agree on how each stage appears in reporting and when it affects the budget view.

    Keep approval status and decisions visible to the people responsible for the purchase. They should be able to distinguish a request awaiting approval from an approved order, see who needs to act, and understand which purchasing rules apply. Clear approval thresholds help routine orders move without unnecessary delays.

    Lab procurement integrations connect scientific purchasing workflows with ERP, P2P, and accounting systems to reduce repeated data entry. Those connections should preserve the identifiers teams need to match records and investigate exceptions.

    Use procurement workflow automation to reduce repetitive data entry, status chasing, and report preparation. Assign someone to review missing information and exceptions so errors are corrected instead of passed from one system to another.

    Be clear about refresh timing. A report updated nightly may be useful, but users need to know that purchases made this morning may not appear yet.

  4. Compare real-time spend vs. budget consistently

    A useful budget view distinguishes costs already recorded by finance from open orders and requests still awaiting approval. Agree on which amounts count toward the operational budget, and avoid counting the same purchase twice.

    Consider a lab with a $100,000 quarterly supply budget. Finance has recorded $60,000 in costs, and another $25,000 sits in open orders that have not yet been included in those costs. The team has $15,000 left to plan with, before any additional pending requests.

    Illustrative budget view

    Amount

    Quarterly supply budget

    $100,000

    Costs already recorded

    $60,000

    Additional open orders, excluding amounts already recorded

    $25,000

    Remaining uncommitted budget

    $15,000

    Without the open orders, the same report would appear to show $40,000 available. That difference could change whether the next purchase should proceed.

    Finance should define how tax, shipping, credits, cancellations, and other adjustments affect your organization's budget view.

  5. Use the findings to improve the next purchase

    Review purchasing patterns with the people who understand them. If a team repeatedly buys outside a preferred agreement, ask whether the product is available, suitable, and easy to order before changing the policy.

    If spending has risen, separate changes in demand from changes in price. A growing research program may need more supplies. A price increase on a frequently purchased item may call for a supplier discussion.

    Check whether negotiated discounts were applied and compare prices for equivalent quantities over time. Review supplier spend across sites before discussing purchasing terms. Combining that information with delivery records can also show whether apparent savings came with delays or extra costs, informing lab supplier management decisions.

    The value of checking purchasing records against agreed terms is illustrated in McKinsey's 2025 procurement research. It describes a global pharmaceutical company whose AI-based invoice-to-contract reconciliation proof of concept identified more than $10 million in value leakage, prompting supplier renegotiations.

    Addressing maverick spend in pharma R&D starts with understanding why purchases leave the preferred process. Use the data to remove the obstacles you find, then check whether buying behavior changes.

How can you tell whether spend visibility is improving?

Choose a few measures that reflect the problems you are trying to solve. Useful starting points include the share of purchasing covered by your reports, the percentage of orders with valid project or cost-center information, and the time needed to explain a budget variance.

Agree on definitions before comparing results. For example, measure reporting coverage against the same set of purchasing channels and reporting dates each month. Otherwise, an apparent improvement may simply reflect a narrower scope.

Use a recurring review to resolve missing information and assign follow-up actions. Broader lab spend management builds on that foundation to improve sourcing, supplier strategy, and cost control.

Deloitte's 2025 Global Chief Procurement Officer Survey found an association between stronger technology and talent capabilities and better enterprise performance. For lab teams, the practical takeaway is to pair reporting tools with people who know how to interpret the information and act on it.

How ZAGENO supports lab spend visibility

A procurement platform improves spend visibility when it captures purchasing activity as orders are placed and connects it with supplier, budget, approval, and order information. This gives procurement and finance a more current view than reports assembled only after invoices arrive.

ZAGENO's procurement spend analytics help authorized users examine lab purchasing and budget utilization using data captured through the platform. As part of scientific procurement orchestration, those insights support supplier and purchasing decisions while researchers access the products they need.

Frequently asked questions about lab spend visibility

  1. What is the difference between spend visibility and spend control?
    Spend visibility shows what is being purchased, by whom, from which suppliers, and against which budgets. Spend control uses policies, approval thresholds, and purchasing rules to influence those decisions. Visibility helps teams identify where controls are needed and assess whether they are working.
  2. How can labs track spending before invoices arrive?
    Track approved purchase orders and open commitments alongside costs already recorded by finance. Show pending requests separately, and update the records when orders are invoiced, changed, or canceled. This helps teams assess available budget without counting the same purchase twice.
  3. Does a procurement platform show purchases made outside it?
    Only if those purchases are brought into its reporting through connected systems, imports, or another established process. Orders placed directly with suppliers or paid by purchasing card can remain outside the view. Teams should confirm which purchasing channels their reports cover and how often the data updates.

 

ZAGENO website homepage on laptop and mobile device

Know where your budget stands before the next order

Your teams should be able to answer a purchasing question without reconstructing the story from emails, spreadsheets, and invoices.

Request a ZAGENO demo to see how connected purchasing data can give procurement, finance, and lab teams a clearer view of where their budgets are going.

Request a Demo

All your lab needs in one place

Access 50,000,000 products in one shop!

Trusted by thousands of scientists, lab managers, procurement and finance teams, ZAGENO's marketplace will help you search and order quickly in one go. Reach out for a demo today!