Skip to content
Lab Pulse | Smarter Science

How Research Operations Teams Help Scientists Spend More Time on Science

Article updated on
Research operations team reviewing laboratory workflow and procurement data

Research Operations (ResOps) coordinates the systems, processes, and resources that support day-to-day laboratory work. In pharma and biotech organizations, this can include improving purchasing workflows, supporting laboratory technology, and resolving operational issues that interrupt experiments.

One practical priority is making sure supplies are ready when scientists need them. That means checking availability during planning, routing requests to the right approvers, and identifying delivery problems early enough for the research team to respond.

This article examines four purchasing bottlenecks that affect laboratory workflows and how Research Operations teams can address them with procurement, finance, and IT.

Table of Contents

    Why boosting R&D velocity is a strategic priority 

    Pharmaceutical and biotech organizations face mounting pressure to accelerate research while managing increasing scientific complexity. Modern research programs depend on a growing ecosystem of technologies, external partners, suppliers, and distributed teams.

    According to McKinsey, improving R&D productivity remains a top priority for life sciences organizations as they seek to speed up development timelines and bring therapies to market more efficiently.

    Research Operations teams are increasingly responsible for:

    • Improving researcher experience
    • Reducing administrative burden
    • Standardizing workflows across sites
    • Supporting AI-enabled research initiatives
    • Ensuring operational continuity across global research organizations
    • Increasing research productivity

    The goal is straightforward: help scientists spend more time on science.

    Scientists need more than laboratory software

    Over the past decade, life sciences organizations have made substantial investments in:

    • Electronic Lab Notebooks (ELNs)
    • Laboratory Information Management Systems (LIMS)
    • Data and analytics platforms
    • Inventory management systems
    • AI-enabled research tools

    These technologies have transformed how experiments are planned and analyzed. However, a critical gap often remains between scientific intent and scientific execution.

    A scientist may identify the next experiment in an ELN but successfully executing that experiment still depends on obtaining the right materials, sourcing approved suppliers, navigating internal purchasing policies, and ensuring products arrive on time. If those processes are fragmented, research slows.

    Organizations evaluating new laboratory technologies should consider how those systems integrate with procurement workflows. Research teams evaluating new systems should understand the differences between lab procurement platforms and lab management software.

    Four purchasing bottlenecks that interrupt laboratory workflows

    To find where a workflow needs attention, follow an actual supply request from experiment planning through delivery. Record where information is missing, decisions are waiting, or researchers must follow up manually.

    Workflow bottleneck Effect on research Operational response
    Product information is scattered across supplier sites Scientists repeat searches and struggle to compare exact specifications, pack sizes, and delivery estimates. Capture product requirements once and provide a consistent way to compare approved purchasing options. Require scientific review before substituting products.
    Approvals, supplier setup, or backorders hold up an order An experiment may need rescheduling because a required item will not arrive in time. Record the date the lab needs the item, identify pending approvals, and assign responsibility for escalating supply problems.
    Purchasing processes differ across sites Researchers must relearn procedures, and requests may arrive without the information needed to process them. Establish shared request requirements and clear local instructions for approvals, delivery, and receiving.
    Order status and upcoming demand are difficult to see Teams discover shortages late or spend time chasing updates. Give researchers access to order status and review upcoming experimental needs against outstanding orders and known supply risks.

    Start with the bottleneck that repeatedly interrupts planned work. Compare the time spent resolving it and the number of affected experiments before and after the change.

    For Research Operations leaders, these are not merely procurement challenges. They are research productivity challenges.  For a practical walkthrough of the purchasing process, see our lab supply purchasing guide, from defining product requirements through receiving and invoice reconciliation.

    Research operations in the AI era

    AI is rapidly changing how research is conducted.

    Scientists increasingly use AI to:

    • Analyze scientific literature
    • Generate hypotheses
    • Design experiments
    • Interpret results
    • Identify promising therapeutic candidates

    However, AI-generated scientific intent still depends on physical execution. Experiments require reagents, consumables, equipment, and approved suppliers. In many organizations, procurement remains disconnected from AI-driven research workflows, which creates a productivity bottleneck the lab of the future cannot tolerate.

    As organizations invest in enterprise AI initiatives, Research Operations leaders are increasingly evaluating how procurement infrastructure can become part of connected, AI-enabled scientific workflows rather than remaining a separate administrative process. Organizations exploring this evolution should understand how AI is transforming scientific purchasing.

    Biopharma leaders increasingly view technology as central to future competitiveness. Deloitte’s 2026 Life Sciences Outlook found that nearly 80% of life sciences executives expect AI to play a central role in driving major organizational change, underscoring the growing importance of connected, AI-enabled research workflows.

    Why traditional procurement tools were not built for research

    Traditional ERP and procure-to-pay systems play an important role in financial governance, compliance, and enterprise purchasing. However, they were not designed around the unique needs of scientific users.

    Researchers expect purchasing experiences that are fast, intuitive, search-driven, embedded within existing workflows, and capable of supporting highly specialized scientific products. Research organizations increasingly require solutions that combine enterprise governance with consumer-grade user experiences.

    This is one reason many organizations are moving toward scientific procurement models that connect researchers, suppliers, procurement teams, and finance functions through a unified experience. To bridge this gap, leading teams prioritize lab ERP and P2P integrations that naturally connect day-to-day experimental workflows with core enterprise purchasing systems.

    From fragmented systems to scientific procurement orchestration 

    Modern Research Operations teams are increasingly viewing procurement as part of the scientific workflow itself. Rather than forcing researchers to navigate fragmented purchasing processes, organizations are investing in infrastructure that connects: 

    Traditional Approach Research Operations Approach
    Multiple supplier portals Unified procurement layer
    Manual purchasing Guided buying and automation
    Disconnected systems Connected scientific workflows
    Fragmented supplier relationships Supplier orchestration
    Administrative purchasing Workflow-embedded scientific procurement

    This shift is often described as scientific procurement orchestration.

    Scientific procurement orchestration connects:

    • Scientific tools such as ELNs and LIMS
    • Enterprise AI assistants
    • Inventory systems
    • Procurement and finance systems
    • Suppliers and distributors
    • Researchers and lab operations teams

    The objective is not simply to purchase products more efficiently; it is to remove operational barriers that prevent researchers from moving quickly.

    Increasingly, Research Operations teams prioritize capabilities such as:

    • Unified search across suppliers
    • Guided buying experiences
    • Preferred supplier routing
    • Automated approvals
    • AI-assisted purchasing recommendations
    • Supplier performance visibility
    • Integrated purchasing workflows

    Together, these capabilities create a more seamless path from scientific intent to procurement execution. Organizations interested in these capabilities should evaluate modern scientific procurement platforms.

    Scientific procurement supports laboratory workflows

    Laboratory workflows do not end when an experiment is designed. Researchers still need timely access to the materials, suppliers, and operational infrastructure required to execute that work.

    As research organizations scale, fragmented purchasing processes can create hidden inefficiencies across laboratory workflows, including:

    • Delayed experiments
    • Duplicate purchasing activities
    • Increased administrative burden
    • Supplier inconsistency
    • Reduced visibility across sites

    Scientific procurement helps eliminate these inefficiencies by connecting purchasing directly to research operations. For many organizations, this represents an important shift.

    Procurement is no longer viewed solely as a cost-control function. It is increasingly recognized as part of the operational infrastructure required to support modern research and improve lab operations efficiency across distributed research teams.

    Essential criteria for a unified scientific platform 

    As organizations evaluate technologies designed to improve researcher productivity, Research Operations leaders should ask: 

    1. Does the platform reduce administrative work for scientists?

      Technology should simplify purchasing and reduce time spent on non-scientific activities. 

    2. Does it support standardized workflows across research teams?

      Consistent processes improve compliance while reducing variability across sites. Organizations seeking to improve consistency should establish lab procurement best practices. 

    3. Can it integrate with existing systems?

      Modern research organizations require solutions that connect with ERP, P2P, inventory, and laboratory ecosystems. 

    4. Does it provide visibility across suppliers and purchasing activity?

      Centralized visibility helps organizations identify risks, improve supplier performance, and support informed decision-making. Organizations should also proactively address supplier fragmentation to improve resilience and visibility. 

    5. Can it scale alongside organizational growth?

      Research organizations need infrastructure capable of supporting new sites, expanding teams, and evolving scientific programs. 

    Helping scientists spend more time on science

    Research organizations have invested heavily in technologies that improve how science is designed and analyzed. Increasingly, they are recognizing that the operational infrastructure supporting research matters just as much.

    "The true measure of Research Operations isn't how many processes become more efficient. It's whether those improvements accelerate scientific discovery and create measurable business outcomes. When you give scientists a connected, intuitive experience that removes operational friction, they spend more time advancing science and less time navigating systems."

    — Jon Zibell, Vice President of Global Alliances and Marketing, SciSure

    Connected operational infrastructure makes that possible. When procurement processes become fragmented, scientists lose time, research programs slow, and organizations struggle to realize the full value of their scientific investments.

    By reducing administrative burden, connecting workflows, and simplifying access to the materials researchers need, Research Operations teams can help scientists focus on what they do best: advancing science.

    Organizations looking to modernize purchasing across global R&D teams should explore solutions purpose-built for pharmaceutical and biotech research organizations.

    Frequently asked questions about research productivity

    1. What is Research Operations in pharmaceutical and biotech organizations?
      Research Operations (ResOps) is the strategic function that manages the infrastructure, technology, and processes required to keep research running efficiently. ResOps drives workflow optimization by streamlining laboratory workflows to maximize scientist productivity. Additionally, the function handles technology management by overseeing critical systems like ELNs, LIMS, and lab management software, while driving organizational standardization to establish consistent, compliant processes across global research sites

    2. Why do scientists spend so much time on administrative tasks?
      Scientists lose valuable time because traditional purchasing tools and lab operations software are disconnected, forcing them to manually manage supplier websites, order tracking, and approvals. This operational fragmentation separates day-to-day laboratory workflows from the supply chain, creating a significant administrative bottleneck.

    3. How does procurement impact research productivity?
      Procurement affects whether the supplies required for an experiment arrive when needed. Incomplete requests, pending approvals, supplier setup, and backorders can delay laboratory work. Research Operations teams can work with procurement to identify recurring delays, clarify responsibilities, and keep researchers informed when an order puts an experiment’s schedule at risk.

    4. What is scientific procurement?
      Scientific procurement is the specialized process of sourcing, purchasing, and managing the technical laboratory supplies, biological reagents, and services required for R&D. Unlike standard enterprise purchasing, it is custom-built to support unique scientific workflows while maintaining corporate financial governance.

    5. What is scientific procurement orchestration?
      Scientific procurement orchestration is the automated coordination of researchers, suppliers, finance systems, and scientific tools through a single, connected workflow. Instead of forcing teams across multiple supplier portals, it embeds procurement directly into lab tools (like ELNs and LIMS) to accelerate research.

    6. Why aren't traditional procurement systems sufficient for research organizations?
      Traditional ERP and procure-to-pay (P2P) systems were built for corporate financial governance, not the unique, fast-paced needs of scientists. Research teams require intuitive, search-driven platforms that support specialized scientific products and integrate seamlessly into existing laboratory workflows.

    Scientific procurement orchestration platform helping pharmaceutical and biotech organizations streamline research purchasing and supplier management.

    Orchestrate your scientific procurement with ZAGENO

    ZAGENO helps pharmaceutical and biotech organizations connect researchers, suppliers, procurement teams, enterprise systems, and AI-enabled workflows through a single scientific procurement orchestration platform designed to keep research moving.

    Request a demo to see how ZAGENO helps research teams reduce administrative burden, improve researcher productivity, and accelerate scientific progress.

    All your lab needs in one place

    Access 50,000,000 products in one shop!

    Trusted by thousands of scientists, lab managers, procurement and finance teams, ZAGENO's marketplace will help you search and order quickly in one go. Reach out for a demo today!